Cases 1 - 10 of 35,060
ANZALONE v. NEW JERSEY CVS PHARMACY, LLC
as 1:2024cv05832
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ANZALONE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY CVS PHARMACY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mello v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv05840
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Susan Mello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Susan Sullivan
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and First Key Master Funding 2021-A Collateral Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pellerin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Pellerin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tonneyck et al v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
Reony Tonneyck, Robert Hann and Ronald Hinton
Defendant:
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc., Roxanne Bowman, Elaine L. Chao and others
Dubus et al v. NVIDIA Corporation
as 4:2024cv02655
Plaintiff:
Andre Dubus, III and Susan Orlean
Defendant:
NVIDIA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
