Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Saddler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv03028
Plaintiff:
Denitzia Saddler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Saddler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00598
Plaintiff:
David Saddler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saddler v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2026cv00079
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Saddler
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saddler v. Keen et al
as 4:2026cv00714
Plaintiff:
Darryl A. Saddler
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Dr. Unknown Rapoff and David Hoffmen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2026cv01602
Plaintiff:
Taijah Jabriel Jackson
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, HDSP, Bjorn Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Greer v. Wills et al
as 3:2026cv00179
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Greer
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Latoya Hughes, Robert Gearhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Graff et al
as 3:2026cv00108
Plaintiff:
Darran Perkins
Defendant:
C/O Graff, Sgt. McKinstry, Sgt. Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Alar LLC et al
as 2:2025cv02059
Defendant:
Alar LLC, Lucifer James Rose, Atif Ikram Saadia Sheikh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Maye v. Kelley et al
as 2:2025cv01241
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Kevin Kelley, Heather Hill, Brandon Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
