Cases 1 - 10 of 100
USA v. Julius Johnson
as 26-1579
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JULIUS SAMUEL JOHNSON
Johnson v. University of Behavioral Health System et al
as 3:2026cv01574
Petitioner:
Marc Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
University of Behavioral Health System, Connie Hernandez, Unkown Male and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In the Matter of Six Skulls Rentals, LLC
as 4:2026cv00538
Petitioner:
Six Skulls Rentals, LLC and Michael S. Moran
Claimant:
DeBorah Jackson Johnson and Samuel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Johnson v. Bisignano
as 5:2025cv00786
Plaintiff:
Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Newsom et al
as 4:2026cv00203
Petitioner:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
Governor Gavin Newsom and San Quentin Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Newsom et al
as 4:2025cv10503
Petitioner:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
Governor Galvin Newsom, CDCR Sec., Warden of CSATF & CCII and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Johnson et al
as 2:2025cv06665
Defendant:
Kevin D. Johnson, Kevin Johnson, Samuel Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Johnson v. Newsom et al
as 3:2025cv09539
Plaintiff:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Newsom and CDCR Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. CSATF Warden
as 4:2025cv09470
Petitioner:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
CSATF Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Sistrunk
as 3:2025cv00718
Plaintiff:
Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Brady Sistrunk
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
