Cases 1 - 10 of 78
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JONES and SHAMEL JONES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17316
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12179
Plaintiff:
CURTIS SAMUEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv22132
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jones
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oxley v. Contra Costa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Samuel Russ Oxley
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff Department, Samuel Jones, Daniel Husted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Allstate Indemnity Co
as 2:2022cv02614
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jones and Misty Jones
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Smith et al v. Warden et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Osuntoka Smith, Andre D Hansbrough, Toney Davis and others
Defendant:
Warden, D Blackburn, Justin Segerstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
