Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Christopher v. Town Administrator et al
as 1:2023cv10823
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher and Robert Christopher LaRoche
Defendant:
Town Administrator, Chief of Police, On Duty Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10800
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samuel Santiago v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 22-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL SANTIAGO
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ROBERT MARSH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04916
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samuel Santiago v. Robert Marsh, et al
as 22-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL SANTIAGO
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ROBERT MARSH, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
SANTIAGO v. MARSH et al
as 5:2021cv01258
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: and DR. ROBERT MARSH
Petitioner:
SAMUEL SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Velasquez (Mason)
as 21-546
Defendant:
Christopher Kittrell, AKA Frog, Lincoln Godoy, Mario Rodriguez and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Irving Mason, AKA Spidey
Santiago-Lebron et al v. Tote Maritime Puerto Rico, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01716
Defendant:
Tote Maritime Puerto Rico, LLC, Insurance Company B, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Conjugal Partnership Between Samuel Santiago and Lourdes Santos, Samuel Santiago, Lourdes Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv16140
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
