Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Smartpay Leasing, LLC
as 3:2018cv01024
Plaintiff:
Sandie Jackson
Defendant:
Smartpay Leasing LLC
Jackson v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00444
Plaintiff:
Sandi Jackson
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee, Sumner County Sheriff's Department, Sonny Weatherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Trevonza et al
as 6:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bobbitt Trevonza, Sandy Jackson, Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jackson et al
as 6:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Carlos Renardo Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Sandy Jackson, Thevonza Bobbit, Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States et al
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Lane
Defendant:
United States, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights et al v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff:
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights, Bruce E. Crosby, William K. Crosby and others
Defendant:
Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
