Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mark Wasmuth v. Sanjiv Da
as 13-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ALLEN WASMUTH, a living Immortal Spiritual being, a living physical man and MEREDITH PHILLIPPI WASMUTH, a living Immortal Spiritual being, a living physical woman
Defendant - Appellee:
SANJIV DAS, Acting artificially as a ordinary/officer/president for CitiMortgage Inc, PAUL INCE, Acting artificially as ordinary/officer/CFO for CitiMortgage Inc, JERRY OCHELTREE, Acting artificially as ordinary/officer/president for First Bank Inc and others
WASMUTH, et al v. DAS, et al
as 1:2011cv01013
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN WASMUTH and MEREDITH PHILLIPPI WASMUTH
Defendant:
SANJIV DAS , PAUL INCE , JERRY OCHELTREE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrios v. Citimortgage et al
as 2:2011mc02014
Plaintiff:
Luis Ambrocio Barrios
Defendant:
Citimortgage and Sanjiv Das
Bever v. Citimortgage et al
as 2:2011mc01943
Plaintiff:
Glenn Wayne Bever
Defendant:
Citimortgage and Sanjiv Das
Angulo v. Citimortgage et al
as 2:2011mc01853
Plaintiff:
Sharon Elizabeth Angulo
Defendant:
Citimortgage and Sanjiv Das
Barajas v. Citi Mortgage et al
as 2:2011mc01852
Plaintiff:
Jose G. Barajas
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage and Sanjiv Das
ANDERSON v. CITI MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01062
Plaintiff:
RODNEY D. ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITI MORTGAGE, INC., SANJIV DAS, PAUL INCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Anthony N Ozogu et al v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
as 2:2010cv09687
Defendant:
R K Arnold, CR Title Services Inc, Richard Cimino and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony N Ozogu and Regina O Thomas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TEHUTI v. USA
as 1:2010cv00260
Plaintiff:
SHEIK TEHUTI
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., SANJIV DAS and KATIE BUSBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
