Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Benchmark Electronics Incorporated et al v. AVX Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv07047
Plaintiff:
Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated, Benchmark Electronics Manufacturing Solutions Incorporated, Benchmark Electronics Manufacturing Solutions (Moorpark) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Shizuki Electric Company Limited, Fujitsu Limited, Nichicon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The AASI Beneficiaries Trust, by and through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee v. AVX Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv03472
Defendant:
Hitachi Chemical Co. Ltd., Nichicon Corporation, Shinyei Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Counter Defendant:
THE AASI BENEFICIARIES TRUST, BY AND THROUGH KENNETH A. WELT, LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
THE FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02268
Plaintiff:
THE FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. doing business as GE APPLIANCES, GE APPLIANCES, WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant:
Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant:
Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15200
Defendant:
LG CHEM, LTD., SONY ENERGY DEVICES CORPORATION, MAXWELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND and MICHAEL FRANK BEDNARZ
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Satoshi Okubo
Respondent:
Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party:
Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15022
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant:
STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
ZICCARELLO v. SANYO ENERGY (U.S.A.) CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv16623
Defendant:
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.) Corporation, SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ziccarello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16855
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
GORDON B. MORGAN
Christopher Andrews, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16803
Defendant / Appellee:
NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
