Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ramon v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02340
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ramon
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. Smith
as 4:2026cv04074
Plaintiff:
Sarah J Lewis
Defendant:
Kenneth R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Crayton v. Boston Housing Authority, et al
as 26-2044
Plaintiff:
COREY CRAYTON
Defendant:
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, ERNESTO SALVIN, Custodian, SHERRI ADAMS, Manager and others
Susquehanna Legal Aid for Adults and Youth et al v. BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY
as 5:2026cv07180
Plaintiff:
Susquehanna Legal Aid for Adults and Youth and PAIGE MARTINEAU
Defendant:
BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY, Middle District of Pennsylvania, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Prather v. NaphCare inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00937
Plaintiff:
Kelli Prather
Defendant:
NaphCare inc., Sarah Jackson and Alicia Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv81169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv81166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gundling v. Board of Commissioners of Lake County, Ohio et al.
as 1:2026cv02255
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gundling
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners of Lake County, Ohio and Sarah Grenier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
