Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Price et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08268
Plaintiff:
Veronica Price , David Bergquist , Ann Scheidler and others
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , Rahm Emmanuel , Rebekah Scheinfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheidler v. Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority et al
as 1:2016cv04288
Plaintiff:
Eric Scheidler
Defendant:
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority , Navy Pier, Inc. , John Graeber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheidler v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 6:2016cv03018
Plaintiff:
Gloria L Scheidler
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hill #153219 v. Hoffner et al
as 1:2015cv01143
Plaintiff:
William M. Hill #153219
Defendant:
Bonita J. Hoffner, Linda Beckwith, Unknown Scheidler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #585924 v. Bradley et al
as 1:2015cv01041
Plaintiff:
Bryant Deandre Harris #585924
Defendant:
James F. Bradley, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #267009 v. Hoffner et al
as 1:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Defendant:
Bonita Hoffner, Unknown Borst, Unknown Scheidler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Hoffner et al
as 2:2015cv10349
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Smith, Sherri Slaght, George Preston and others
Defendant:
Bonita Hoffner, Borst, Scheidler and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William Hill v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-1492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, BONITA J. HOFFNER, Warden, LINDA BECKWITH, Deputy Warden and others
Scheidler v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv03176
Plaintiff:
Ian M. Scheidler
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
