Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott Repella v. Luzerne County C&Y Services, et al
as 22-1130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT JAMES REPELLA
Defendant / Appellee:
LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES and LUZERNE COUNTY SOLICITORS OFFICE
SMITH v CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, et al.
as 7:2020cv00121
Defendant:
BILLY J WHEELER, HUDSON DURDEN, TIM CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ARNELO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Repella v. Luzerne County C&Y Services et al
as 3:2019cv00469
Defendant:
Luzerne County C&Y Services
Plaintiff:
Scott James Repella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donte Parrish v. Steven Rowe, et al
as 13-2452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONTE PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN ROWE, U.S. Marshall, SIX OTHER AGENTS FORM VARIOUS AGENCIES, SGT. DAVID GODFREY, York City and others
Parrish v. Rowe et al
as 1:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Donte Parrish
Defendant:
Steven Rowe, Six other agents from various agencies, David Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKPORT, MA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Haymon-Peynado v. Ellis et al
as 1:2011cv01103
Plaintiff:
Naja J. Haymon-Peynado
Defendant:
Daniel J. Ellis, Scott James, Debbie Loucks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
