Cases 41 - 49 of 49
United States of America v. Davis
as 6:2011cv03482
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nicholas Sean Davis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
Davis v. Racette
as 1:2011cv05557
Petitioner:
Sean Davis
Respondent:
Superintendent Steven Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iles v. Lester et al
as 8:2010cv00694
Plaintiff:
Terrence D. Iles, Sr.
Defendant:
Trilly Lester, City of Tampa Commissioners, Jane Castor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00853
Petitioner:
SEAN DAVIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Davis et al v. The Progressive Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv01361
Plaintiff:
Robert Sean Davis and Sean Davis Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
The Progressive Corporation and United Financial Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Davis et al v. Kroger Company, et al
as 1:2008cv00508
Plaintiff:
E Larry Davis and Sean Davis
Defendant:
Kroger Company, Douglas Leist, Paul R Toth and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medina et al v. Napoli et al
as 1:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
Troy Brooks, Charles Brown, Anthony Medina and others
Defendant:
David F. Napoli, Angela A. Bartlett, Marilyn Bridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop et al v. Vensons et al
as 1:2007cv03952
Plaintiff:
Travis Bishop, Jr., Rafic Badran, Magdaleno Barron and others
Defendant:
Apartment Investment And Management Company, Aimco Properties LP and NHP Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. Sanders et al
as 2:2007cv00273
Plaintiff:
Sean Davis
Defendant:
Sanders, T.A. Jones and J. Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
