Cases 11 - 20 of 296
Dietl et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co., et al
as 4:2018cv02186
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Robert Dietl and James Dietl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Skillern v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 4:2018cv00702
Plaintiff:
Joyce Skillern
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 3:2018cv02526
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Plaintiff:
Sharon P Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruben Medina, et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co., et al
as 5:2018cv00934
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Heather Ximenez and Ruben Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burton v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2018cv00268
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company, Sears Roebuck and Co., Jim Wilson and Associates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dora Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson-Curtis v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Patsy Johnson-Curtis
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williamson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Cameron International Corp., Industrial Holdings Corporation f/k/a Carborundum Company, Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Edwards v. Pacific Cycle, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01358
Plaintiff:
Alan Edwards
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle, Inc. , Sears Holdings Management Corporation , Sears, Roebuck and Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welch v. La-Z-Boy Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01611
Plaintiff:
Larry D Welch
Defendant:
La-Z-Boy Incorporated , LZB Manufacturing Inc and Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Vega v. Craftsman et al
as 3:2018cv03329
Plaintiff:
Kristan Vega
Defendant:
Craftsman, Sears, Sears Stoneridge Mall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
