Cases 21 - 30 of 257
Fort et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FORT, NEW MEXICO SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC. and others
Defendant:
Governor of NM Michelle Lujan Grisham, Patrick M. Allen, Jason R. Bowie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae:
Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Grant v. Lamont
as 23-1344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie Grant, Jr., Jennifer Hamilton, Michael Stiefel and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Lamont, Jr., in his official capacity, James Rovella, in his official capacity, Patrick Griffin, in his official capacity and others
Wolford et al v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jason Wolford, Alison Wolford, Atom Kasprzycki and others
Defendant:
Anne E. Lopez and Maui County
Amicus Curiae:
California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated, Gun Owners of California, Second Amendment Law Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Incorporated, Gun Owners for Safety, Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund and others
White et al v. Cox
as 1:2023cv12031
Plaintiff:
Rudolph White, Robert Cox, Kenley Exume and others
Defendant:
Michael Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Fitz, et al v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 23-35478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK FITZ, GRAYGUNS, INC., G4 ARCHERY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLEN ROSENBLUM, In her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon and TERRI DAVIE, In her official capacity as Superintendent of the Oregon State Police
Ronald Koons, et al v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON SIEGEL, JASON COOK, JOSEPH DELUCA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RONALD KOONS, NICHOLAS GAUDIO, JEFFREY M. MULLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Not Yet Classified:
PRESIDENT NEW JERSEY STATE SENATE and SPEAKER OF THE NEW JERSEY GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Appellee:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Amicus Curiae:
IAN AYRES, FREDERICK VARS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
KOONS et al v. PLATKIN et al
as 1:2022cv07464
Plaintiff:
RONALD KOONS, NICHOLAS GAUDIO, JEFFREY M. MULLER and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM REYNOLDS, GRACE MACAULAY, ANNEMARIE TAGGART and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
AARON SIEGEL, JASON COOK, JOSEPH DELUCA and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROFESSORS OF PROPERTY LAW and Brady
Intervenor:
NICHOLAS P. SCUTARI and CRAIG J. COUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED, ET AL. v. USA
as 1:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
