Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Blakely v. Stirling et al
as 5:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
James Gatewood Blakely
Defendant:
Dir Stirling, Assoc Dir McCall, Warden Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakely v. Stirling et al
as 5:2017cv01040
Plaintiff:
James G Blakely
Defendant:
B.P. Stirling, M McCall, D Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennifer Jasmaine v. Mr. Futrelle
as 17-6357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER ANN JASMAINE, f/k/a Duane Leroy Fox
Defendant - Appellee:
A. DAUGHETY, RN Lead Nurse, DR. ELIZABETH BYRD, DR OWENS and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, of Grievance Resolution Board Members
Brooks v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Brooks
Defendant:
Roeisha Butler, Officer Rivers, Sgt. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Angelozzi et al
as 3:2016cv01089
Defendant:
Rick Angelozzi, Bristol, C/O Elgin and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Gene Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Myers et al
as 4:2016cv00947
Plaintiff:
Aryee Henderson
Defendant:
Ronaldo D Myers, Dr. Randolph, Mr. Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duane Fox v. Mr. Futrelle
as 16-6090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE LEROY FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. FUTRELLE, Head of Mental Health, M. MAGANA, RN Lead Nurse, A. DAUGHETY, RN Lead Nurse and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, of Grievance Resolution Board Members
Ellis v. Moody et al
as 1:2015cv00598
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lamar Ellis
Defendant:
Officer Moody, Lt. Banks and Sgt. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Futrelle et al
as 5:2015ct03294
Plaintiff:
Duane LeRoy Fox
Defendant:
Mr. Futrelle, M. Magana, A. Daughety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Moody et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00754
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lamar Ellis
Defendant:
Officer Moody, Lt. Banks and Sgt. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
