Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Rivera, Sr. et al v. Aponte et al
as 1:2014cv05148
Defendant:
Francine Allman, P.O. Javier Aponte, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Monica Jadeja Ramos, Samuel Ramos, Migdallia Ramos Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donell Prince v. Thomas Aiellos, et al
as 14-1149
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
DONELL L. PRINCE
Defendant - Appellant:
SGT. THOMAS AIELLOS, badge #221, individually and as police officer in Police Department, City of Hackensack
Defendant - Appellee:
DET. W. INGLIMA, individually and as police officer in Police Department, City of Hackensack, DET. A. GUTIERREZ, individually and as police officer in Police Department, City of Hackensack, DET. A. FERRAOILI, individually and as police officer in Police Department, Cit of Hackensack and others
Amato v. Barone et al
as 1:2013cv13094
Plaintiff:
Joseph Amato
Defendant:
Off. Michael Barone and Sgt. Thomas Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Phenix City Police Dept. et al (MAG+)
as 3:2013cv00537
Plaintiff:
Carl P. Dennis
Defendant:
Phenix City Police Dept., State of Alabama, Raymond J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lambright v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03744
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lambright
Defendant:
Sgt. Thomas Larsen, Lieutenant Paul McDermott, P.O.'s "John Doe" #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linwood et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03258
Defendant:
Sgt. Thomas Gambardella, P.O. Daniel Roselli and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Ashley Linwood and Javier Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
