Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Patrick Gil v. Jane Doe
as 23-7244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK NILO GIL
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE, C.O. 1, LT. FOWLKES, SGT. WARD and others
Cintron v. Gabriellie et al
as 3:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Frankie Cintron
Defendant:
C/O Gabriellie, Sgt. Euwin, C/O Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cintron v. Hamilton Correctional Institution-Annex et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Frankie Cintron
Defendant:
Hamilton Correctional Institution-Annex, Sgt. Ward, Sgt. Ewin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. C. O. STANLEY et al
as 4:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
BRYAN JEFFREY JONES
Defendant:
C. O. STANLEY, SGT. DANGLER, SGT. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIBB v. LOOP et al
as 4:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GEURIN D. BIBB
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, SGT DANGLER, SGT GEARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. LOCK et al
as 4:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHARLES WOODS
Defendant:
Sgt. LOCK, Sgt. DANGLER, Sgt. KINDERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Broadbent et al
as 1:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Marcellous L Walker
Defendant:
Anthony Broadbent, Sgt Ward and Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. MEDLOCK et al
as 4:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
DAVID JASON TAYLOR
Defendant:
CODY MEDLOCK, FRANK LOOP, CAPTAIN FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gil v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nilo Gil
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lt. Fowlkes, Sgt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Smith v. Avalos et al
as 3:2020cv01534
Defendant:
LT. Cardenas, William D. Gore, Sgt. Kimberly and others
Plaintiff:
Marquell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
