Cases 1 - 10 of 19
BURTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18951
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DOUGLAS BURTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. Reign et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Bailey
Defendant:
NFN Reign and Kristi M Satterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hager v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2022cv01229
Petitioner:
Shawn Douglas Hager
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. PPA 300, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv12128
Defendant:
PPA 300, LLC, Real Estate Service Solutions Company, LLC, Riverview Crossings and others
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Shawn Douglas Hager v. Washington County, et al
as 20-3074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Douglas Hager
Defendant / Appellee:
Washington County and State of Minnesota
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77616
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DOUGLAS ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05585
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Vincent Companaro and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Colson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hager v. Washington County et al
as 0:2019cv02809
Defendant:
Washington County and State of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Hager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Byers et al
as 1:2019cv00058
Defendant:
Melissa Elaine Byers and Shawn Douglas Byers
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Allen et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11795
Plaintiff:
Joyce Little, Estate of Fletcher Eberle, Nicholas Martino Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
