Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28111
Plaintiff:
SHAWN HAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teddy Hawkins v. USA
as 23-5023
Petitioner / Appellant:
TEDDY SHAWN HAWKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Teddy Hawkins v. USA
as 22-5265
Petitioner / Appellant:
TEDDY SHAWN HAWKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57685
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2020cv04032
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hupp et al v. R C Hawkins Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Michael Shawn Hawkins, R C Hawkins Construction Co., Inc., Santee Trucking and others
Plaintiff:
Pat Hupp, Jennifer Rainwater and Steve Rainwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hawkins v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv04195
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Shawn Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chartwell Preston Mill, LLC v. Doughty et al
as 1:2018cv01830
Plaintiff:
Chartwell Preston Mill, LLC
Defendant:
Cheryl Doughty, Sean Bell and Shawn Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawkins v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Shawn Hawkins
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Medium Security Institute (MSI) et al
as 4:2014cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miller, Steven Dunn, Tyrone Williams and others
Defendant:
Medium Security Institute (MSI), Ronald Glass, Pat Schommer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
