Cases 1 - 10 of 57
US v. Shay John
as 24-4020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAY NEIL JOHN
Amaya et al v. Infinite Homes Group 646/500 LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Amaya, Luis Miranda and Moises Aleman
Defendant:
Infinite Homes Group 646/500 LLC, Infinite Homes Group 218 LLC, Infinite Homes Group 4108 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williston v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Williston
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Sweat v. The Grievance Committee et al
as 2:2023cv06420
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Defendant:
The Grievance Committee and Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sweat v. Bright Heart et al
as 2:2023cv06419
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Defendant:
Bright Heart, Pipins and Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Dhatt v. Enviva Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
TAJE DHATT
Defendant:
Enviva Inc., John K. Keppler, Michael A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv03296
Plaintiff:
Mariesa Shay Bryant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RANZY v. SHAY
as 1:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
RASHAD C. RANZY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROBERT SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
