Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 57
William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey
as 17-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM A. TACCINO
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK MORRISEY, SUE ROBEY, J. COURRIER and others
Ray et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv11877
Plaintiff: Kim Ray , Denise Just , Dorothy Blackmon and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taccino v. Morrisey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00164
Plaintiff: William A Taccino
Defendant: Patrick Morrisey, Sue Robey, J. Courrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
Taccino v. Morrisey et al
as 1:2016cv03774
Plaintiff: William A. Taccino
Defendant: Patrick Morrisey, Sue Robey, J. Courrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Robert Delapp
as 16-7520
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT SHAY DELAPP, a/k/a Shay
US v. Ah-Shay Nicholson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4706
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: AH-SHAY NICHOLSON
Cynthia Faye Davis et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03399
Plaintiff: Cynthia Faye Davis , Barbara J. Adams , Terry M. Anders and others
Defendant: Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sawyer v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00314
Plaintiff: Derick Shay Sawyer
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sweat v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02695
Petitioner: Jeremy Shay Sweat
Respondent: Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shay v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00594
Plaintiff: Pamela Shay
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?