Cases 31 - 40 of 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Meadows v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00399
Petitioner:
Eric Meadows
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry White, II v. Shelby Searls
as 23-6426
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY S. WHITE, II
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELBY SEARLS
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shelby Peddigree v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01559
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Shelby Peddigree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ingram v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00230
Petitioner:
David L. Ingram
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bishop v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Mason Bishop
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hedrick v. Marshell (sic) et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
William K. Marshell (sic), III, Shelby Searls, L.T.C. Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lentz v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023ct03078
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
Travon Campbell, Aisha Cherry, Hunter Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Defendant:
William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls and Sherry Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
