Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SHULTZ v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv04739
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DEAN SHULTZ
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Shultz v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2026cv00324
Plaintiff:
Dustin Shultz
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Ryan Thornell, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Collins Jr et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04433
Plaintiff:
Gerald E Collins Jr, Canaan Finley-Chappel, Thaison Somsri-Betts and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Kirkland v. CDCR et al
as 2:2026cv01593
Plaintiff:
Trevon R. Kirkland
Defendant:
CDCR, Jason Shultz, Gavin Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shultz v. Bisignano et al
as 4:2026cv03093
Plaintiff:
Stacie Shultz
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Harrison v. City of Bend et al
as 6:2026cv00395
Plaintiff:
Tristann Melanie Harrison
Defendant:
City of Bend, Deschutes County, Eric King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Priest v. Crawford et al
as 3:2026cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ross Priest
Defendant:
Seth Crawford, Matthew Hassle, Jeffery Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
