Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Balraj Paul v. Kevin Plank
as 24-1144
Plaintiff:
BALRAJ PAUL, derivatively on behalf of Under Armour, Inc., ANTHONY VISKOVICH, DALE OLIN and others
Defendant:
KEVIN A. PLANK, BRAD DICKERSON, GEORGE W. BODENHEIMER and others
Sippel v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Julie Dawn Sippel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sippel Haas v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02071
Plaintiff:
Heidi Sippel Haas
Defendant:
Stericycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alexander, Robert v. Bender, Molly et al
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Alexander
Defendant:
CO Molly Bender, CO Curtis L. Visser, CO Collin D. Visser and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. City of Rochester Police Depar
as 21-2913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos A. Santiago and Melissa A. Laffredo
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Rochester, Officer Tyshon Williams, individually and in his capacity as a City of Rochester Police Officer, Officer Joseph Bonnacci, individually and in his capacity as a City of Rochester Police Officer and others
Defendant:
District Attorney Kristen Sippel, Other Officers Names Unknown and Lieutenant Name Unknown
SIPPEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91429
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SIPPEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIPPEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11072
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SIPPEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
