Cases 1 - 10 of 442
Solorzano v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Cris Solorzano
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Solorzano v. Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company
as 2:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
Juan Solorzano
Defendant:
Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stephen Moretto v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-11049
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MORETTO
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., RONALD SOLORZANO, TRUNG VAN LE and others
Solarzano v. USA
as 3:2024cv00753
Petitioner:
Edgar Solorzano Fierros
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Blanco Villalobos et al v. More Consulting Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Mario Blanco Villalobos, Arnulfo Hernandez Solorzano, Estanislao Bustillo Castro and others
Defendant:
More Consulting Corp. and Brian J. Morrell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Marisela Urbina-Solorzano v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3070
Petitioner:
MARISELA SILVANIA URBINA-SOLORZANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Gutierrez Solorzano v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Gutierrez Solorzano
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Daniel M. Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
