Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Sorrow v. City of Atlanta
as 1:2017cv02908
Plaintiff:
Lori Sene Sorrow
Defendant:
City of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrows v. Colvin et al
as 4:2017cv02250
Plaintiff:
Teresa Renee Sorrows
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
William Herrera, et al v. City of Palmdale, et al
as 17-55761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ROBERT HERRERA, MONA MOLINA HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H., WILLIAM RYAN HERRERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PALMDALE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, BUD DAVIS and others
Loyd Sorrow v. Executive Director TDCJ, et al
as 17-20015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOYD LANDON SORROW, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH - C T TERRELL UNIT and others
William Robert Herrera et al v. City of Palmdale et al
as 2:2016cv09453
Defendant:
Anne Ambrose, Anne Ambrose, Arcidiancono and others
Plaintiff:
Mona Molina Herrera, William Robert Herrera, William Ryan Herrera and others
Sorrow et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08315
Plaintiff:
Vivian Sorrow and Benjamin Sorrow
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorrow v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2016cv02530
Plaintiff:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant:
State Of Texas, University Of Texas Medical Branch, Erin Alison Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrow v. Executive Director TDCJ et al
as 4:2016cv02493
Plaintiff:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant:
Executive Director TDCJ, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical Branch-CJ Terrell Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SORROW v. USA
as 5:2016cv00285
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
WESLEY SORROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
