Cases 31 - 40 of 368
Dixon v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Dixon
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ron Broomfield, Scott Kernan, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RYALS v. MURPHREE et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
DELACY A RYALS
Defendant:
NATALIE MURPHREE, JOEL STANTON and Corporal EARL OSBON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Stanton et al
as 9:2021cv01339
Plaintiff:
Leroy Peoples
Defendant:
David Stanton and Scot Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffie v. Best Buy Co., Inc et al
as 2:2021cv03641
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Department, Best Buy Co., Inc doing business as Best Buy, Daniel Paul Regan and others
Plaintiff:
Stanton McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MUDD v. JONES et al
as 4:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
DAWUAN TERRELL MUDD and DIVINE SERENITY MOON
Defendant:
WARDEN DESHAWN JONES, SGT JUAN USQUIANO, LT PERNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Senkbeil et al
as 7:2021cv01180
Plaintiff:
Clemmie Lee Spencer
Defendant:
Josh Senkbeil, Price, Jr, Christian Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bressi v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2021cv01265
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bressi
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Parole Board, Ms. Stanton, Terry Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higdon v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Roman Christian Higdon
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Kevin Sprayberry and Otis Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Stanton et al
as 4:2021cv00560
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Irwin and Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Robert Toole, Cedric Taylor, Timothy Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
