Cases 81 - 90 of 939
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Swist et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Adam Swist and Bianca Richardson
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mallouk et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Mallouk, Alfredo Rodriguez Perez and Arjun Dhawan
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lomax v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2023cv01426
Petitioner:
Matthew S. Lomax
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Workers United
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Short v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Amy F Short
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cardtek International, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Cardtek International, Inc.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
