Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Ephraim et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Ephraim and Sterking Ephriam
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Warden, Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Sterk, Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00899
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sterk v. Hassel Family Chiropractic D.C. P.C. Employer Stock Ownership Plan et al
as 4:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Vince Hassel, Hassel Family Chiropractic DC PC, Hassel Family Chiropractic D.C. P.C. Employer Stock Ownership Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Jaci Sterk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
STERK et al v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv11059
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MAHER and CASEY STERK
Defendant:
COREY FLAUM, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA and JOHN DOES 1-15
STERK et al v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as NJ/3:20-CV-11059
Plaintiff:
STERK, KEVIN MAHER and CASEY STERK
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, COREY FLAUM and JOHN DOES 1-15
Sterk v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv01159
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Ryan Sterk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PATEL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00758
Defendant:
PIKUL PATEL, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
