Cases 11 - 20 of 219
Jefferson v. Akins
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Elmer Lee Jefferson
Defendant:
Sterling Akins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. 2020 Lexus RX350, VIN: 2T2HZMDA4LC241116 et al
as 6:2023cv03031
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2020 Lexus RX350, VIN: 2T2HZMDA4LC241116, 2020 Ford Transit Van, VIN: NM0LS7E21L1464162, 2020 Jeep Wrangler, VIN: 1C4HJXFGXLW312762 and others
Claimant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Smith et al v. Sterling Systems, Inc.
as 0:2022cv02507
Plaintiff:
Joel Smith, Heather Grazzini, Joe Fowler and others
Defendant:
Sterling Systems, Inc. and Minnesota Laborers Vacation Fund, the
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Woolford v. Circuit Court of Bentonville
as 5:2022cv05141
Plaintiff:
Sterling D Woolford, Sr
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Bentonville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolford v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Sterling D Woolford
Defendant:
Higgins and Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolford v. Circuit Court of Bentonville
as 4:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Sterling D Woolford, Sr
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Bentonville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phillip Sterling, Jr. v. Travis Hill
as 22-2089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Travis Hill, Pike County Arkansas
Sterling v. Hill
as 6:2022cv06053
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Travis Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
