Cases 1 - 10 of 1,037
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Glover v. Brian Sterling
as 6:2024cv02172
Plaintiff:
Wallace Glover
Defendant:
Director Brian P Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sterling v. Puryear
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sterling
Defendant:
T. Puryear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frye v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 5:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Marion Wade Frye
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Director Bryan Sterling, Kenneth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Roderick Washington v. Shen Jay Fern et al
as 2:2024cv02933
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Shen Jay Fern, Laura Priver, Madeline Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Sterling
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Mimi Joe Marshall
Defendant:
Bryan P. Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 24-20155
Petitioner:
Larry Donal Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frye v. Sterling
as 5:2024cv01585
Petitioner:
Marion Wade Frye
Respondent:
Bryan Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
. Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
