Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Steve Jackson v. Fayette County School
as 14-6210
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOLS
Jackson v. Holland
as 6:2014cv00161
Petitioner:
Steve Jackson
Respondent:
J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez v. Children Home AID AID et al
as 3:2013cv50279
Plaintiff:
Cody Ramirez
Defendant:
Shelly Anglos, Nancy West, Steve Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Jackson v. Fayette County Schools
as 2:2013cv02061
Plaintiff:
Steve Jackson
Defendant:
Fayette County Schools
Miscellaneou:
Jimmie German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mike et al v. McCoy et al
as 1:2012cv01215
Defendant:
Terry McCoy , Steve Jackson , Dave McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Mike , William Mike , Shannon Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson et al v. Andrews
as 1:2012cv02105
Plaintiff:
Steve Jackson , Lori Jackson and Top Gun Military Apparel, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Andrews
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jackson v. Wilson
as 6:2010cv00039
Petitioner:
Steve Jackson
Respondent:
Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tony DeLoach v. State of South Carolina
as 10-6026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY DELOACH
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. BROWN, JAMES E. ELLISON, JAMES R. ODOM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHARLES CONDON, SOUTH CAROLINA STATE LEGISLATURE and others
Georgia Outdoor Network, Inc. et al v. Marion County, Georgia
as 4:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Georgia Outdoor Network, Inc., J. Steven Burch, Jere Smith and others
Defendant:
Marion County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2008cv02520
Plaintiff:
Steve Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvidor Godinez, Supt. Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
