Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gezelle Guillard, et al v. Tom Pyle, et al
as 23-3424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEZELLE GUILLARD
Plaintiff:
JOHN PETERSON and TOSHALYN MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM PYLE, CANDY RUSSELL, DAVE YOST and others
Catharine Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05007
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Roach
as 4:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Devin Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
Steven Roach
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00811
Plaintiff:
Nichols, Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Peterson vs. Athens City School District, et al.
as 2:2022cv02046
Plaintiff:
John Peterson
Defendant:
Athens City School District, Kara Bolin, Spectrum TV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Guillard et al v. Pyle et al
as 2:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Gezelle Guillard, John Peterson and Toshalyn Murray
Defendant:
Tom Pyle, Justin Elekes, Kayla Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maximo Lopez et al v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:15-CV-04435
Plaintiff:
Maximino Lopez and Andy Roxas
Defendant:
Top Rank, Inc. , Robert Arum , Todd duBoef and others
Brian Denis Flynn et al v. Emmanuel Pacquiao et al.,
as 2:2015cv03381
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Michael Koncz, Emmanuel Pacquiao and others
Plaintiff:
John Day and Brian Denis Flynn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
