Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DIAZ RIVAS v. MUNIR et al
as 2:2026cv08372
Plaintiff:
JORGE F DIAZ RIVAS
Defendant:
HANZALA MUNIR, PATRYCJA MAZEWSKA, RASHEED STITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pulley v. Tatum et al
as 3:2026cv00395
Plaintiff:
Aremis Pulley
Defendant:
Esker Tatum, Ralf Stith, Michelle Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stith v. Hernandez Villalta et al
as 1:2026cv02434
Plaintiff:
Ron L. Stith
Defendant:
Jaime Alberto Hernandez Villalta and SAMS & A Trucking LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
STITH et al v. EPOCA INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2026cv04190
Plaintiff:
DARRELL STITH and STACY STITH
Defendant:
EPOCA INTERNATIONAL, INC. and AMAZON
Cross-Complainant:
EPOCA INTERNATIONAL, INC. and AMAZON
Cross-Defendant:
AMAZON and EPOCA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Daniel Phoenix v. Mark Amonette
as 26-6452
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX
Defendant:
DR. MARK AMONETTE, STEVE HERRICK, DR. ALVIN HARRIS and others
Gregory Avent v. Bertha Stith
as 26-6415
Plaintiff:
GREGORY E. AVENT
Defendant:
BERTHA M. STITH, BRIAN ROBERTS, Brunswick County Sheriff, JASON MOORE, District Attorney Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stith v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
as 1:2026cv01023
Plaintiff:
Howard L Stith
Defendant:
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Stith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00159
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Diane J. Stith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Avent v. Stith, et al.
as 1:2026cv00511
Plaintiff:
Gregory E. Avent
Defendant:
Bertha M. Stith, Brian Roberts, Jason Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
