Cases 21 - 30 of 269
Dungarvin Kentucky, LLC v. Stith
as 4:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dungarvin Kentucky, LLC
Defendant:
Geraldine Stith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Stith v. Brunswick County
as 2:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Michael Stith
Respondent:
Brunswick County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stith v. Brunswick County Circuit Court
as 2:2022cv00481
Petitioner:
Michael Stith
Respondent:
Brunswick County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Clarence Stith III
as 22-4627
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLARENCE STITH, III
Silvas v. Stith et al
as 4:2022cv03852
Plaintiff:
Julian G Silvas
Defendant:
Judge David Stith, Stephen Giovanni and Mark Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Brunson v. Josh Stein
as 22-7228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN EUGENE BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH STEIN, BARRY H. BLOCH, JESSICA B. HELMS and others
Poston v. Oates et al
as 1:2022cv01139
Plaintiff:
Joseph G Poston
Defendant:
J.D. Oates, III, Dr. Galvin Harris, Dr. K Sharma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Frankie Miller v. T. Jarrell
as 22-6784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKIE M. MILLER, JR., a/k/a Frankie Miller-El
Defendant / Appellee:
T. JARRELL, Lieutenant Colonel, W. JARRETT, Assistant Warden, W. TEACHEY, Major and others
Defendant:
K. PHILLIPS, C. PUTNEY, C. BOONE and others
Atkins v. Doctor Shamar et al
as 1:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
David Atkins
Defendant:
Doctor Shamar, Stith and T Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Gogel, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Gilbrith Gogel, Puranjyot Chaggar, Ashanti Holland and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, E. M. Konopka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
