Cases 41 - 50 of 578
Stoll v. Steel River Systems, LLC
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Beverly G. Stoll
Defendant:
Steel River Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stoll v. Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08641
Plaintiff:
Misty Stoll
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Stolle et al
as 1:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
Cecil R. Lewis
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Thompson and Holk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Stolle
as 2:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
William D Fowler
Defendant:
Kenneth W. Stolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
STOLL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23950
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN STOLL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stoll v. Guo
as 3:2022cv07035
Plaintiff:
Cliff Stoll
Defendant:
Qiming Guo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Stoll v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02587
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Edward Stoll
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOLL v. ARMSTRONG FLOORING, INC.
as 5:2022cv04414
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA K STOLL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG FLOORING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Harrington v. Stolle et al
as 3:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
William Henry Harrington, III
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Nursing Department and Dr. J
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Harris v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE ELLIOTT HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY, CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
