Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Maryam v. Chime/Stride Bank
as 1:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
Fe'Anah Bent Maryam
Defendant:
Chime/Stride Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williamson v. Edward D. Jones & Co LP et al
as 4:2022cv03739
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williamson
Defendant:
Edward D Jones & Co LP, Chime Financial Inc, Stride Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robert Johnson v. Credit Acceptance Corp, et al
as 22-2561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
Robert Johnson v. Credit Acceptance Corp, et al
as 22-2393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOHNSON v. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Chime Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson
Defendant:
Chime Financial, Inc., Stride Bank, National Association and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eric Alan Sanders v. Chime Stride Bank, N.A.
as 3:2021cv06068
Plaintiff:
Eric Alan Sanders
Defendant:
Chime Stride Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
