Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Han v. Lockett et al
as 1:2018cv04005
Plaintiff:
Ki Sung Han
Defendant:
Paul Lockett and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Torres-Torres v. KW international, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Victor Torres-Torres
Defendant:
KW international, Inc. and Sung Il Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bergeron v. Chevron Nigeria Limited et al
as 4:2018cv00767
Plaintiff:
Reggis "Pete" Bergeron
Defendant:
Chevron Nigeria Limited , Chevron U.S.A. Inc. , Paul Lundy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHAFER v. LASER SPINE INSTITUTE, LLC, et al.
as 3:2018cv00023
Defendant:
ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC., TROY HENRY CARON, SUNG T. CHOE and others
Plaintiff:
GAYLA DENISE SCHAFER and WILLIAM BRENT SCHAFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Choe et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02812
Plaintiff:
Sung Choe and Carolyn Choe
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Choe et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Sung Choe and Carolyn Choe
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARK v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03155
Plaintiff:
SUNG PARK
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAM v. NELKE
as 3:2016cv08632
Plaintiff:
SUNG BOK NAM
Defendant:
MARK D. NELKE, D.M.D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bae v. Garvey
as 16-3198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Young Sung Lee
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Hae Suk Bae
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Katelyn M. Garvey
Knaus et al v. The Boeing Company
as 4:2015cv03916
Plaintiff:
She Lee, Jianjia Yang, Yirui Wang and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Petitioner:
Asiana Airlines Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
