Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Lee v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2024cv00984
Petitioner: Sung Min Lee
Respondent: U.S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sivak v. Friedland et al
as 3:2023cv06252
Plaintiff: Lacey Sivak
Defendant: Judge Friedland and Judge Sung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05996
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Odom v. 188th County Court et al.
as 6:2023cv00580
Petitioner: James Odom
Defendant: 188th County Court, Kim Sung and Judge Scott Novy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05964
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jun v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02136
Petitioner: Sung Mo Jun
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Odom v. Sung We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00237
Plaintiff: James Odom
Defendant: Kim Sung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. USA
as 8:2023cv01885
Petitioner: Sung Wook Kim
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jun v. Eischen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv02704
Petitioner: Sung Mo Jun
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yang v. Federal Bureau of Prisons We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv03217
Petitioner: Sung S. Yang
Respondent: Alvis House and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?