Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gardner et al v. Boso
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Gardner and Susan Gardner
Defendant:
Edwin B. Boso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Lyons v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
as 23-2871
Petitioner:
JOSHUA L. LYONS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Not Classified By Court:
N. LE BEAU, OFFICER, No. 21831, LEVI MILLER, CAPTAIN, Head Supervisor, P. ROGERS, SERGEANT, No. 16174 Supervisor and others
Joshua L. Lyons v. N. Le Beau et al
as 5:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Lyons
Defendant:
Officer N. Le Beau, Captain Levi Miller, Sergeant P. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fresh Air for the Eastside, Inc. et al v. Waste Management of New York, L.L.C.
as 6:2018cv06588
Plaintiff:
Andrew Brickle, Brandie Antenucci, Nathan Bubb and others
Defendant:
Waste Management of New York, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Curtis Jackson v. Timothy Delgado, et al
as 16-16979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS RENEE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HOWARD DELGADO and SUSAN GARDNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Delgado, et al.
as 2:2015cv02158
Plaintiff:
Curtis Renee Jackson
Defendant:
Timothy Howard Delgado and Susan Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Gardner v. Andersen Eye Associates, PLC
as 1:2015cv10269
Plaintiff:
Susan Gardner
Defendant:
Andersen Eye Associates, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28815
Plaintiff:
Susan Gardner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
