Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Doe v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2019cv01467
Defendant:
Pamela Peter, Syracuse University, Bernerd Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Bass v. Syracuse University
as 5:2019cv00566
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Plaintiff:
James Bass
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
DOE v. Syracuse University
as 5:2018cv01100
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FastBridge Learning, LLC et al v. Syracuse University
as 0:2018cv01550
Plaintiff:
FastBridge Learning, LLC and Theodore J. Christ and Colleagues LLC
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
John Doe #1 et al v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2018cv00496
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #2 and others
Defendant:
Pamela Peter, Syracuse University, Kent Syverud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2018cv00377
Defendant:
Pamela Peter, Syracuse University, Bernerd Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richard C. Weber Jr. v. Ohio State Kaskalni et al
as 2:2018cv00745
Defendant:
Canton Toudrashi Unsled Sencelli, Colorado State University Sencelli, Creighton Unisled Sencelli and others
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Weber, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
