Cases 1 - 10 of 8,874
Zelesnik v. Massie et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Congressman Thomas Massie, Mayor Aftab Pureval, Tom T. Wallace and others
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kaplan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Kaplan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herron v. Schafer et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Eric Herron
Defendant:
Michael Schafer, Unknown Fountain, T. Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Charmane T. Tanner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02274
Plaintiff:
Marqual Hill
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Officer Rice and T. Payton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Holmes, Jr. v. Hamilton County, OH Government, et al
as 24-3341
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ISIAH HOLMES, JR.
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OH GOVERNMENT, STACEY DEGRAFFENREID and JOSEPH T. DETERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
