Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Casasola v. Armani Investments LP et al
as 4:2023cv01904
Plaintiff:
julio casasola
Defendant:
armani investments LP, hsc management, LLC, edward t lee and others
LEE et al. v. VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC. et al
as 2:2019cv11763
Defendant:
JANE DOE, VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC., COMPANY XYZ and others
Plaintiff:
CHUN T. LEE and LIPING SUN
Smith et al v. AKAL Security Incorporated
as 2:2018cv01117
Plaintiff:
Roy Smith , Juan J Aguilar , Curtis Baughman and others
Defendant:
AKAL Security Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 16-1675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 16-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Luna et al v. Gon Way Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01411
Plaintiff:
Rafael Castro, Freddy Luna and Fidel Sanchez
Defendant:
Gon Way Construction Inc., Sweeney T. Lee and Wendell Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway
as 14-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 14-1585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS and SECRETARY OF LABOR
Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Lee
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Lee et al v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 4:2007cv00526
Plaintiff:
David S. Lee and Helen T. Lee
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
