Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bosley v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2026cv00684
Plaintiff:
Margaret Bosley
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sisti v. Bosley, Inc., et al.
as 26-3458
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SISTI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
BOSLEY, INC. and BOSLEY MEDICAL GROUP, a medical corporation
Bosley-Guinther et al v. Wylie, D.D.S.
as 5:2026cv00104
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bosley-Guinther and Byron Guinther
Defendant:
Charles L. Wylie, D.D.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
United States v. Brandon Bosley
as 26-1894
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Bosley
Ryan Sinclair v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2026cv00938
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sinclair
Defendant:
County of Orange, Deputy Jerell Bosley and Does Orange County Sheriff's Department, 1-10, individual capacity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maurice Cooper v. Bosley
as 26-6459
Plaintiff:
MAURICE DOUGLAS COOPER
Defendant:
BOSLEY, Maryland State Trooper, #7040, individual capacity, BATISTA, Maryland State Trooper (TFC), individual capacity, JOHN DOE #1, Maryland State Trooper, individual capacity and others
Bosley v. EP Wealth Advisors, LLC
as 3:2026cv01579
Plaintiff:
Bradford Bosley
Defendant:
EP Wealth Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brandon James v. Bosley, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02278
Plaintiff:
Brandon James
Defendant:
Bosley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fowler v. Unitis et al
as 1:2026cv00395
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fowler
Defendant:
Hannah Unitis, Anthony Lupo, Eric Bosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
