Cases 1 - 10 of 42
BORDEN v. WELLPATH CARE et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
ALLEEM ALBERT-WALKER BORDEN
Defendant:
WELLPATH CARE, T. CURTIS, A. KROMAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stabler v. Carl T. Curtis Health Center et al
as 8:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Vida Stabler
Defendant:
Carl T. Curtis Health Center, Indian Health Services and Department of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Schaper v. Lensar, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schaper and Christopher P. Bolster
Defendant:
Lensar, Inc., Nicholas T. Curtis, Thomas R. Staab, II and others
Shelben Curtis v. Ron Neal
as 23-1858
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHELBEN T. CURTIS
Respondent / Appellee:
RON NEAL
Curtis v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00509
Petitioner:
Shelben T Curtis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CURTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53568
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TONY T CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38854
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH T CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22920
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE T CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19454
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN T CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. Nessel et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Curtis
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker, United States of America and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
