Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Carroll v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Joseph T. Carroll, Sr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carroll v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02004
Petitioner:
Joseph T. Carroll, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shreve v. Stephenson et al
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve
Defendant:
B M Stephenson, B. Jones, Officer Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pinyard v. Kyle et al
as 8:2020cv02436
Defendant:
Mr. Linder, Mr. Boman, T. Carroll and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Pinyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. California, State of et al
as 3:2017cv01922
Plaintiff:
T. Carroll
Defendant:
California, State of, Paramo, . and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
Kailey v. Jefferson County, Colorado, Sheriff's Office
as 1:2016cv01631
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado, Sheriff's Office, Thodore (I) Mink, Thodore Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Donohue v. J. Lambert
as 16-6628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK DONOHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. J. LAMBERT, LT. MCCOWAN, LT. LIEUTENANT PAYNE and others
Defendant:
LT. SERGEANT BLEVENS, WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA, C/O OFFICER BEVERLY and others
T. Carroll v. State of California
as 2:2016cv01821
Petitioner:
T. Carroll
Respondent:
State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
