Cases 31 - 40 of 59
United States of America et al v. Becerra Lamberty
as 3:2017cv02185
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Juan L Rodriguez Becerra, Jose E Rodriguez Becerra and others
Defendant:
Idalia Becerra-Lamberty
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
R.V. Coleman v. Debie Asuncion et al
as 2:2017cv04525
Defendant:
Debie Asuncion, A. Johnson, A. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
R V Coleman
Rodriguez v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Melin T Rodriguez
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Northwest Trustee Services Inc and U S Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miguel Diaz v. Hurley, et al
as 16-17228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HURLEY, FARMAR, HALL and others
Michael Anderson v. T. Rodriguez
as 16-6887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOSEPH ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
T. RODRIGUEZ, Deputy/Loudoun County Deputy Sheriff
Defendant:
LOUDOUN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Employed Loudoun County Sheriff Deputies
Diaz v. Hurley et al
as 2:2015cv02083
Plaintiff:
Miguel Enrique Diaz
Defendant:
Hurley, Farmar, Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garrett v. Ask-Carlson et al
as 1:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Garrett
Defendant:
K. Ask-Carlson, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Loudoun County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2014cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Anderson
Defendant:
Loudoun County Sheriff Office and T. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
