Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adley et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02217
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Adley, A.L and D.L., Miguel and Sylvia Alonzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hodges et al v. Rufus et al
as 3:2017cv00859
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges and Minor, T.M
Defendant:
Freddie Rufus, Jacqulyn Maddon, Aaron McCurdy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Pollard v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ann L. Pollard
Defendant:
Judy Brown, Betty Glascok, Theresa McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. South Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Donna Richardson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Public Safety , N.A. Miller and T.M. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feliciano v. Banks et al
as 5:2016ct03309
Plaintiff:
Filiberto Feliciano
Defendant:
T.M. Banks, Melinda Green and Captain Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Graves, II v. T.M. Yancey
as 12-6248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN L. GRAVES, II
Defendant - Appellee:
T.M. YANCEY, W.D. MARSH and H.S. BROWN
GRAVES v. YANCEY et al
as 1:2009cv00841
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. GRAVES, II
Defendant:
T.M. YANCEY, W.D. MARSH and H.S. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
