Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Franklin v. Lockriagh et al
as 7:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Saunders Miles Franklin
Defendant:
Superintendant Lockriagh, C/O Allen, Dottie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deon Turner v. Terry Kokolis
as 23-6696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEON ARNELL TURNER
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY KOKOLIS, Director of Talbot County Department of Corrections and Detention Center, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, FOOD SERVICE PROVIDER and others
CLARK v. MALIK et al
as 3:2023cv03697
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY S. CLARK
Defendant:
MUDBUSER MALIK, TERESA MAYER, KEVIN O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penner v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Penner
Defendant:
Galipeau, Talbot, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Jarrett et al
as 3:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Lockhart
Defendant:
Vanessa Jarrett, Chelsea Mercer, Candice Talbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Jarrett et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Lockhart
Defendant:
Vanessa Jarrett, Chelsea Mercer, Candice Talbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talbot v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00847
Petitioner:
Steven Talbot
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leroy Hall v. Paul Talbot
as 23-1961
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY H. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor
Foreman v. Dick
as 23-30258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Renata Foreman
Defendant / Appellee:
Shelly Dick, Chief Judge, Brandon Fremin, Peter John Smyczek and others
Talbot v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Brian J. Talbot
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
