Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04329
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tan v. Patella, et al
as 26-2226
Defendant:
THOMAS BOWLER, in the official capacity as the Sheriff of Berkshire County, Massachusetts, KATHERINE J. BIERWAS, KRISTA WROLDSON MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
HONG LIANG SHEN and JIE TAN
JB Dallas LLC et al v. City of Hurst, Texas et al
as 4:2026cv01374
Defendant:
Tanya Wilson and City of Hurst, Texas
Plaintiff:
Ben Tan, JB DFW 2 LLC and JB Dallas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv12401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nguyen v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 5:2026cv12019
Plaintiff:
Tan Dai Nguyen
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, not it its individual capacity but solely as indenture trustee for Vista Point securitization Trust 2024-CES3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tan v. Columbia Bank
as 2:2026cv03831
Plaintiff:
Li Tan
Defendant:
Columbia Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Tan et al v. Rest, Inc.
as 3:2026cv05720
Plaintiff:
Leonard Tan and Adam Aldrich
Defendant:
Rest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
