Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weiss v. Ryde Group Ltd et al
as 1:2026cv07854
Plaintiff:
Shari Weiss
Defendant:
Ryde Group Ltd, Junming Terence Zou, Chen Fei Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
JIANG v. TAN
as 3:2026cv01768
Plaintiff:
ZIYAO JIANG
Defendant:
LIP-BU TAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
San Francisco Shipyard Residents, et al. v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc., et al.
as 26-5864
Plaintiff:
SAN FRANCISCO SHIPYARD RESIDENTS, JORGE HIDROBO, LIEN CHI and others
Defendant:
TETRA TECH EC, INC., TETRA TECH, INC., ANDREW BOLT and others
Tan v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2026cv00468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tan
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Marks, et al.
as 26-5727
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY H. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANA MARKS, E. PARKS, J. MAINWARING and others
Van v. Novo Building Products et al
as 1:2026cv02511
Plaintiff:
Thien Tan Van
Defendant:
Novo Building Products and Brian Beckamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00716
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
